The Exit Review

The IPO is Recovering, M&A is Accelerating, and AI is the Reason for Both

Published on : March 26, 2026

Something interesting came through in last year’s CPO research from Products That Count. When asked whether M&A would be a major part of their growth strategy over the next one to three years, over 75% of CPOs said yes. Not “maybe.” Not “we’re exploring it.” A definitive yes. That number tells you where the market is heading, and it’s worth sitting with for a moment if you’re a venture-backed founder still anchoring your company’s story around an IPO.

Because the IPO market did come back. But it came back different. And for most founders building right now, the better question isn’t “when will the IPO window reopen?” It’s “what exit path actually makes sense for what I’m building?”

TL;DR

1. Over 75% of CPOs surveyed by Products That Count say M&A is “very important” for growth, driven by the need to acquire AI talent and technology.
2. U.S. VC-backed IPOs dropped 85% from 2021’s peak of 327 completed deals to just 50 in 2023, with median deal sizes falling from $200M to $14M.
3. Recovery is real but selective: 2025 saw 63 completed IPOs at a $1.2B median valuation, and 2026 is expected to generate $55B to $65B in proceeds.
4. The median time from founding to IPO now exceeds 11 years, making it incompatible with most founder and fund lifecycles.
5. AI is compressing build timelines by up to 4x, making startups acquisition-ready faster and M&A a structurally more common exit.

The Best Product Leaders Already Moved to an M&A Mindset

The shift didn’t happen overnight, but the signal is now pretty clear. According to the 2025 CPO Insights Report, the highest-performing CPOs are the ones pursuing inorganic growth: acquiring startups, entering new product categories, and treating M&A as a way to create order-of-magnitude change rather than incremental improvement. The report draws a useful distinction between “good” CPOs who experiment with AI for efficiency gains, “great” ones who transform workflows organically, and the “best” ones who are actively acquiring to reimagine their business.

According to the CPO Rising Series featuring Brex CPO Karandeep Anand, inorganic growth has to be rooted in customer value and core strategy. The mistake most acquirers make is underestimating the real cost and overestimating how fast they’ll get to market after close.
According to the CPO Rising Series featuring Glassdoor CPO Andy Chen, product leadership involvement in M&A is now considered essential for vetting product fit, evaluating engagement metrics, and making sure acquisitions align with the company’s long-term vision.
According to the 2025 CPO Insights Report, FinTech and SaaS companies acquire for specialized technology and talent, while retail uses M&A for vertical integration.

If you’re a founder, this is worth paying attention to. The companies most likely to acquire you are being told by their own product leaders that M&A is a survival strategy. That changes how you should think about building.

What Actually Happened to the IPO Market (and Why It Froze)

According to PitchBook data on VC-backed U.S. IPOs from 2015 through early 2026, the story is stark. In 2021, 327 companies completed IPOs worth over $104 billion combined. By 2022, that dropped to 59 deals worth about $4 billion. In 2023, only 50 made it through.

Completed VC-backed IPOs in the U.S., 2015 to 2025
Number of completed deals per year
2015
109
2016
73
2017
91
2018
120
2019
115
2020
173
2021
327
2022
59
2023
50
2024
61
2025
63
Pre-correction
Drought (2022–2023)
Recovery
Source: Mighty Capital, based on PitchBook data (completed VC-backed U.S. IPOs, 2015–2025).
The Fed pushed rates above 5% by mid-2023. When you can park money in Treasurys at 5% risk-free, speculative growth equity gets a lot less interesting for institutional allocators.
Companies that raised at 2021 valuations couldn’t reconcile those marks with public multiples, which fell from 13.3x trailing sales to under 5x.
According to PitchBook, failed and cancelled IPOs hit 46 in 2022, the highest in the dataset. Companies pulled filings rather than price into a public down round.
Down rounds jumped from about 8% of deals in 2022 to 20% in 2023, and startup bankruptcies doubled year over year.

The IPO didn’t go away because companies got worse. The pricing environment that made it work (near-zero rates, cheap capital, tolerance for unprofitable growth) got pulled out from underneath everyone in about 18 months.

The Window Reopened, But for a Different Kind of Company

Good news: the recovery is real. According to PitchBook, completed VC-backed IPOs ticked up to 61 in 2024 with median valuations at $549 million. By 2025, median valuations hit $1.2 billion and total U.S. proceeds reached roughly $44 billion.

Average revenue among 2025 tech IPOs exceeded $800 million. These are mature companies, not early-stage rockets.
The 2026 pipeline looks strong, with estimates of $55B to $65B in proceeds and potential listings from SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic.
Down-round IPOs became common in 2025, and many traded up post-listing. Investors are rewarding honest pricing.
According to PitchBook, median time from founding to IPO for companies valued above $500M now exceeds 11 years.

That last number is the one I’d encourage every founder to sit with. Eleven years. Most fund cycles run seven to ten. Most founders aren’t planning on that timeline. The IPO is back, but for a narrow slice of companies willing to stay private for over a decade and price realistically when they come out.

AI Makes M&A the Natural Outcome, Not Just a Backup Plan

This is where the M&A story goes from cyclical to structural. AI is compressing the time it takes to build, ship, and iterate on software products, and that changes exit math on both sides of the table.

According to the 2025 CPO Insights Report, the best product teams are now shipping up to 4x faster than pre-AI benchmarks. The traditional 10:1 engineer-to-PM ratio is shifting toward 2:1.
According to the CPO Rising Series featuring Cox Automotive CPO Marianne Johnson, “build, partner, or acquire” is the standard growth framework for product leaders, with acquisition preferred when capability gaps are too large to close organically.
According to the CPO Rising Series featuring Life360 CPO James Selby, post-acquisition success comes down to prioritizing speed over perfection, unified cultural values, and human-to-human connection across merging teams.
If a small team can build in six months what used to take 20 people two years, the number of acquisition-ready startups in any given market is going to multiply. Acquirers already see this happening.

Two exit paths, two very different timelines
How AI-compressed build cycles are shifting the default founder exit

IPO PATH
Narrowing, elongating
M&A PATH
Accelerating, broadening
Timeline
11+ years median, founding to listing
Timeline
Compressing as AI shrinks build cycles by up to 4x
Profile required
20–30% YoY revenue growth, 15–20% EBITDA margins, $800M+ revenue
Profile required
Clean IP, modular product, integration-ready architecture, cultural fit
Annual capacity
~63 completed deals in the best recent year, 800+ unicorns waiting
Buyer demand
75% of CPOs say M&A is critical for growth. VC-backed M&A above $500M at highest since 2021
AI effect
Raises the bar: public investors now demand profitability and scale
AI effect
Multiplies acquisition-ready startups. Acquirers can’t build fast enough alone
Available to few. Timeline mismatches most fund cycles.
The statistically likely outcome. Build toward it from day one.
Source: Mighty Capital, based on Products That Count and PitchBook data.

For founders, the takeaway is exciting, not limiting. Faster build times mean you reach product-market fit sooner, which means you become interesting to acquirers sooner. The companies commanding premium multiples are the ones whose products integrate cleanly and whose teams adapt fast.

Building with Exit Optionality from the Start

None of this means building to flip. It means building so every path stays open, with the most statistically likely one (M&A) treated as a first-class outcome.

Keep cap tables clean, financials auditable, and data rooms organized from year one. What are fair seed round terms in the US matters not just for your raise, but for how acquirers evaluate deal complexity later.
Build modular, integration-friendly product architecture. Acquirers pay premiums for products that slot into existing platforms without a rebuild.
Know your buyer universe by year two. Which companies in your space have made acquisitions, what did they pay, and what were they really buying?
Work with best VCs for product-led growth companies and top operator-led funds at seed that prepare portfolio companies for the exit data says is most likely.
Avoid term sheet red flags founders should avoid: onerous liquidation preferences and anti-dilution provisions that make M&A math unattractive for buyers down the road.

The IPO market is recovering and will produce meaningful outcomes in 2026. But for most venture-backed founders, the exit is going to look different. The founders who do well here are the ones who stop treating M&A as Plan B and start treating it as the plan the data has been pointing to all along.